I've just been on a brief fact-finding mission to Estonia - a country that counts a hunger to learn among its many virtues. Estonia has often been at the forefront of e-government, and at one point (almost) cut and pasted laws from other countries which it liked. A session with senior officials in the Estonian equivalent to the Cabinet Office also brought home how much we can learn from nimbler countries.
We are delighted to announce that we are working with the ESRC - and others - to create an Alliance for Useful Evidence.
This week I'd like to share a couple of data graphics that have caught my eye over the past few weeks.
"You say "evidence". Well, there may be evidence. But evidence, you know, can generally be taken two ways" - Dostoevsky, Crime & Punishment, 1866
The blogs over the past two weeks have demonstrated that embedding rigorous evidence in decision making is not always a straightforward task. As the above quote shows, this is further complicated by data not always showing a single course of action for decision makers to take.
We have talked about the need for more and better use of evidence, but this does not always mean commissioning costly academic research. Instead we can find new ways of utilising the information already available and empowering wider society to make use of it. This means that as well as innovating with new programmes and policies, we also need to innovate with the tools we use to evaluate them.
As one of the ten Age Unlimited projects, our mission is to help employers support carers through our Employers for Carers service. Thanks to support from NESTA, we're building on this offering by helping older carers extend their working lives and combine their caring and work commitments healthily and productively.
Not everybody thinks that evidence is the most important thing in the world. But most would recognise that knowing whether a programme of intervention is going to be harmful to them, their family or friends, is a big deal.
Last Friday saw the close of the first round of applications for the Innovation in Giving Fund - a £10m fund established by the Office for Civil Society and NESTA - to invest in new ideas with the potential to bring about a significant uplift in giving and exchange of time, assets, skills, resources and money to achieve social goals.
Research, evidence and data do not exist in a vacuum. To influence decision making, sources of information have to compete with a myriad of other factors, ranging from political pressure, lobbyists, public opinion, ideology and personal values. If the research findings clash with the dominant view, how can these factors be managed to embed evidence into decision making?
Most people would recognise that we need to improve how we measure the impact of services and programmes. Yet what do we do when an evaluation brings back negative findings? In the quest for 'what works' do we shy away from discussing what doesn't?
Follow our daily updates on Twitter @nesta_uk
Take part in the discussion on our LinkedIn group
Share your views on our Facebook page
Sign up for our regular updates for the latest news and opportunities.